Subverting Aristotle: religion, history, and philosophy in early modern science

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scholasticism, appropriation, and censure -- Humanists' invectives and Aristotle's impiety -- Renaissance Aristotle, Renaissance Averroes -- Italian Aristotelianism after Pomponazzi -- Religious reform and the reassessment of Aristotelianism -- Learned anti-Aristoteliansim -- History, erudition, and Aristotle's past -- Pious novelty.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy, religion, and science in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.John W. Yolton (ed.) - 1990 - Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press.
Getting science wrong: why the philosophy of science matters.Paul Dicken - 2018 - London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Science and nonbelief.Taner Edis - 2006 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Voluntarism and early modern science.Peter Harrison - 2002 - History of Science 40 (1):63-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-16

Downloads
4 (#1,615,905)

6 months
1 (#1,479,630)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Craig Edwin Martin
University of Venice

Citations of this work

What Does a Renaissance Aristotelian Look Like? From Petrarch to Galilei.Marco Sgarbi - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (2):226-245.
Pietro pomponazzi.Stefano Perfetti - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Aristotelianism in the renaissance.Heinrich Kuhn - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references