What is the upper limit of value?

Abstract

How much value can our decisions create? We argue that unless our current understanding of physics is wrong in fairly fundamental ways, there exists an upper limit of value relevant to our decisions. First, due to the speed of light and the definition and conception of economic growth, the limit to economic growth is a restrictive one. Additionally, a related far larger but still finite limit exists for value in a much broader sense due to the physics of information and the ability of physical beings to place value on outcomes. We discuss how this argument can handle lexicographic preferences, probabilities, and the implications for infinite ethics and ethical uncertainty.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Critical phenomena and breaking drops: Infinite idealizations in physics.Robert Batterman - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):225-244.
Basinger on Reichenbach and the Best Possible World.Bruce Reichenbach - 1980 - International Philosophical Quarterly 20 (3):343-345.
Emergence and singular limits.Andrew Wayne - 2012 - Synthese 184 (3):341-356.
Harmonic Oscillator Trap and the Phase-Shift Approximation.H. S. Köhler - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (9):960-972.
Matter in Its 'Infinity'.T. J. Blakeley, Jiři Marek & L. E. Musberg - 1984 - Studies in Soviet Thought 27 (1):25-31.
Matter in its 'infinity'.Jiři Marek & L. E. Musberg - 1984 - Studies in East European Thought 27 (1):25-31.
On Aristotle's Natural Limit.Tyler DesRoches - 2014 - History of Political Economy 46 (3):387-407.
Non-representative Quantum Mechanical Weak Values.B. E. Y. Svensson - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (12):1645-1656.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking in quantum systems: Emergence or reduction?Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):379-394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-27

Downloads
6,466 (#733)

6 months
687 (#1,932)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Manheim
Association for Long Term Existence and Resilience

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Moral Uncertainty.William MacAskill, Krister Bykvist & Toby Ord - 2020 - Oxford University Press.
Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad.Sean M. Carroll - 2020 - In Shamik Dasgupta, Brad Weslake & Ravit Dotan (eds.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge. pp. 7-20.
Consequentialism and Cluelessness.James Lenman - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4):342-370.

View all 22 references / Add more references