Military robots should not look like a humans

Ethics and Information Technology 25 (3):1-10 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using robots in the military contexts is problematic at many levels. There are social, legal, and ethical issues that should be discussed first before their wider deployment. In this paper, we focus on an additional problem: their human likeness. We claim that military robots should not look like humans. That design choice may bring additional risks that endanger human lives and by that contradicts the very justification for deploying robots at war, which is decreasing human deaths and injuries. We discuss two threats—epistemological and patient. Epistemological one is connected with the risk of mistaking robots for humans due to the limited ways of getting information about the external world, which may be amplified by the rush and need to fight with robots in distance. The patient threat is related to the developing attachment to robots, that in military contexts may cause additional deaths by the hesitance to sacrifice robots in order to save humans in peril or risking human life to save robots.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Governing (ir)responsibilities for future military AI systems.Liselotte Polderman - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (1):1-4.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (4):303-306.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):151-154.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):239-242.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):87-90.
Instructions for authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (1):93-96.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):257-260.
Editorial.[author unknown] - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):49-49.
Robots for the rest of us or the 'best' of us?Peter Danielson - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):75-81.
The ethics of hacking. Ross W. Bellaby.Cécile Fabre - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (3):1-4.
The Ethics of AI in Human Resources.Evgeni Aizenberg & Matthew J. Dennis - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-3.
Correction to: the Ethics of AI in Human Resources.Evgeni Aizenberg & Matthew J. Dennis - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (1):1-1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-18

Downloads
18 (#824,856)

6 months
12 (#207,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.John Danaher - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2023-2049.
Killer robots.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):62–77.
The Philosophical Case for Robot Friendship.John Danaher - forthcoming - Journal of Posthuman Studies.
The other question: can and should robots have rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.

View all 21 references / Add more references