- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework
Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Significance testing in a bayesian framework: Assessing direction of effects.Henry Rouanet - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):217-218.
Combining argumentation and bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.
Significance Testing in Theory and Practice.Daniel Greco - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):607-637.
The Null-hypothesis significance-test procedure is still warranted.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):228-235.
The Confirmational Significance of Agreeing Measurements.Casey Helgeson - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):721-732.
Quitting certainties: a Bayesian framework modeling degrees of belief.Michael G. Titelbaum - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bayesian confirmation theory: Inductive logic, or mere inductive framework?Michael Strevens - 2004 - Synthese 141 (3):365 - 379.
Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation.Stephan Hartmann & Matteo Colombo - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (2).
What the Bayesian framework has contributed to understanding cognition: Causal learning as a case study.Keith J. Holyoak & Hongjing Lu - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):203-204.
If you've got an effect, test its significance; if you've got a weak effect, do a meta-analysis.John F. Kihlstrom - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):205-206.
Bayes in the Brain—On Bayesian Modelling in Neuroscience.Matteo Colombo & Peggy Seriès - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):697-723.
The significance-effect is a communicational effect.Torkild Thellefsen, Bent Sørensen & Martin Thellefsen - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):209-222.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-12-11
Downloads
7 (#1,387,044)
6 months
4 (#790,339)
2019-12-11
Downloads
7 (#1,387,044)
6 months
4 (#790,339)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Confidence and gradation in causal judgment.Kevin O'Neill, Paul Henne, Paul Bello, John Pearson & Felipe De Brigard - 2022 - Cognition 223 (C):105036.
The influence of polarity items on inferential judgments.Milica Denić, Vincent Homer, Daniel Rothschild & Emmanuel Chemla - 2021 - Cognition 215 (C):104791.
Internal attention modulates the functional state of novel stimulus-response associations in working memory.Silvia Formica, Ana F. Palenciano, Luc Vermeylen, Nicholas E. Myers, Marcel Brass & Carlos González-García - 2024 - Cognition 245 (C):105739.
Looking at Mental Images: Eye‐Tracking Mental Simulation During Retrospective Causal Judgment.Kristina Krasich, Kevin O'Neill & Felipe De Brigard - 2024 - Cognitive Science 48 (3):e13426.
An Open-Source Cognitive Test Battery to Assess Human Attention and Memory.Maxime Adolphe, Masataka Sawayama, Denis Maurel, Alexandra Delmas, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer & Hélène Sauzéon - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
References found in this work
Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.Zoltan Dienes - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.M. Marsman, T. Jamil, A. Ly, J. Verhagen, J. Love, R. Selker, Q. F. Gronau, M. V. Smíra, S. Epskamp, D. Matzke, E. J. Wagenmaker, J. N. Rouder & R. D. Morey - 2018 - Psyconomic Bulletin and Review 25 (1):35-57.
Who Should Be Afraid of the Jeffreys-Lindley Paradox?Aris Spanos - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (1):73-93.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-vk9kt uwo