Why algorithmic speed can be more important than algorithmic accuracy

Clinical Ethics 18 (2):161-164 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) often outperforms human doctors in terms of decisional speed. For some diseases, the expected benefit of a fast but less accurate decision exceeds the benefit of a slow but more accurate one. In such cases, we argue, it is often justified to rely on a medical AI to maximise decision speed – even if the AI is less accurate than human doctors.

Similar books and articles

Decision Time: Normative Dimensions of Algorithmic Speed.Daniel Susser - forthcoming - ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '22).
On algorithmic fairness in medical practice.Thomas Grote & Geoff Keeling - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (1):83-94.
Algorithmisches Entscheiden, Ambiguitätstoleranz und die Frage nach dem Sinn.Lisa Herzog - 2021 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 69 (2):197-213.
Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason.Reuben Binns - 2018 - Philosophy and Technology 31 (4):543-556.
Is Evolution Algorithmic?Marcin Miłkowski - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (4):465-475.
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness.Pak-Hang Wong - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):225-244.
Rawls’s Original Position and Algorithmic Fairness.Ulrik Franke - 2021 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (4):1803-1817.
The Oxford Handbook of Algorithmic Music.Alex McLean & Roger T. Dean (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-22

Downloads
345 (#60,958)

6 months
142 (#26,801)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?