Classical Philosophical Approaches to Lying and Deception

In Jörg Meibauer (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Lying. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Handbooks. pp. 13-31 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter examines the views of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle on lying. It it outlines the differences between different kinds of falsehoods in Plato (real falsehoods and falsehoods in words), the difference between myths and lies, the 'noble' (i.e., pedigree) lie in The Republic, and how Plato defended rulers lying to non-rulers about, for example, eugenics. It considers whether Socrates's opposition to lying is consistent with Socratic irony, and especially with his praise of his interlocutors as wise. Finally, it looks at Aristotle's condemnation of lies, and asks whether lies to enemies, and self-deprecating lies by the magnanimous person, are not base.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deception: why do people lie?Michelle R. Prather - 2018 - Huntington Beach, CA: Teacher Created Materials.
The Noble Art of Lying.James Mahon - 2017 - In Alan H. Goldman (ed.), Mark Twain and Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 95-111.
The Definition of Lying and Deception.James Edwin Mahon - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-12

Downloads
189 (#106,586)

6 months
143 (#30,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Mahon
Lehman College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references