Cosmopolitanism as a Moral Imperative

Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (2):41-47 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I consider and respond to two arguments against cosmopolitanism, the membership needs argument and the preferential treatment argument. I argue that if there are reasonable grounds for endorsing universal norms such as human rights, then there are no reasonable grounds for rejecting moral cosmopolitanism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
35 (#454,663)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Mahoney
Kansas State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references