Karl Pearson's Gresham lectures: W. F. R. Weldon, speciation and the origins of Pearsonian statistics

British Journal for the History of Science 29 (1):43-63 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The scientific legacy of Karl Pearson and his role as one of the principal architects of the modern theory of mathematical statistics, has generated enough interest to have created an intellectual enterprise on various aspects of his life and work. Despite this interest, Pearson's earliest and most formative statistical work which he delivered in thirty of his thirty-eight Gresham lectures from 17 November 1891 to 11 May 1894 has, to date, been given very little consideration. Pearson is perhaps, best known to historians of science for his first eight Gresham lectures, delivered in London in February and May, 1891, on ‘The Scope and Method of Modern Science’, as these lectures were published with modification in theGrammar of Sciencein 1892. The only discussions which have emerged from some of the other thirty lectures have come from Egon Pearson and Steve Stigler. As the great bulk of these lectures have not been fully utilized, previous attempts to identify the impetus to his statistical work have been derived either from his teaching of correlation at University College London in 1895–96 or from his third statistical paper which, in part, addresses Francis Galton's work on simple correlation and simple regression. In spite of the emphasis on Galton's work on simple correlation and regression, little attention has been given to Pearson's more innovative work in that paper, which includes his development of the following statistical methods: multiple correlation, multiple regression, the standard error of estimate, the coefficient of variation and the use of determinantal matrix algebra for biometrical methods. This use of a higher form of algebra not only provided a most striking departure from earlier forms and uses of statistics, but it led to an increasing specialization in the emerging discipline of ‘mathematical statistics’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘‘Describing our whole experience’’: The statistical philosophies of W. F. R. Weldon and Karl Pearson.Charles H. Pence - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):475-485.
Karl Pearson and the professional middle class.D. MacKenzie - 1979 - Annals of Science 36 (2):125-143.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
The grammar of science.Karl Pearson - 1911 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.
Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on mendelism and biometry.Margaret Morrison - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.
On After-Trial Criticisms of Neyman-Pearson Theory of Statistics.Deborah G. Mayo - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:145 - 158.
Review: Karl Pearson's History of Statistics. [REVIEW]Ian Hacking - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (2):177 - 183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
17 (#864,542)

6 months
7 (#420,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Dimensions of Scientific Controversy: The Biometric—Mendelian Debate.Robert Olby - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):299-320.
Species and Varieties, Their Origin by Mutation.Hugo De Vries & D. T. Macdougal - 1905 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (16):438-441.
The causes of human variability.Ronald A. Fisher - 1919 - The Eugenics Review 10 (4):213.

Add more references