Universality and Difference: O'Keeffe and McClintock

Hypatia 5 (2):149-157 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critique of the idea of universality in art and science that considers the examples of Georgia O'Keeffe's work as an artist and Barbara McClintock's work as a scientist. A consideration of their lives and work brings out their differences in the inherently male fields of art and science. Their underlying commonality is found in a shared view of nature involving fluidity, concern for detail, and caring and feeling, traits often characterized as "female". This enables each of them to assert her own identity in her work and contributes to its remarkable success.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
11 (#1,148,327)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

This Sex Which Is Not One.Luce Irigaray - 1977 - Cornell University Press.

Add more references