The Poet, The Critic, and the Moralist: Horace, Epistles 1.19

Classical Quarterly 27 (02):359- (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I begin by quoting from two valuable recent works on Horace. Professor Brink in his Horace on Poetry writes: ‘The centre of the short piece lies in lines 21—34. Readers, among them critics and poets, had denied one aspect of the Odes which was surely above criticism—the striking originality of these poems. Horace's defence turns on the question of originality’ and ‘Epistle 19 is unique in that it alone among the literary satires and letters reiterates Horace's claim to be the Latin fidicen’ . And Dr. McGann in his Studies in Horace's First Book of Epistles : ‘In Ep. 19... as in the literary satires, Horace is a practising poet or at least a very recently practising one, engaged in defending himself against hostile criticism’ and ‘As the only epistle concerned exclusively with literary matters, the nineteenth stands apart’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
17 (#634,530)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy.D. C. Innes - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):165-.
Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy.D. C. Innes - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (1):165-171.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references