Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy

Classical Quarterly 29 (1):165-171 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Augustan poets refer curiously often to the possible composition of a Gigantomachy, as in Prop. 2.1 and 3.9, Ov.Am. 2.1.11 ff.,Trist. 2.61 ff. and 331 ff., and the future study of natural philosophy, as in Verg.Georg. 2.475 ff. and Prop. 3.5.25 ff. These ambitions are rejected, abandoned, or firmly set in the future. I suggest that the function of both is closely similar since they provide traditionally sublime themes to contrast the poet's present ‘humbler’’ task.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy.D. C. Innes - 1979 - Classical Quarterly 29 (01):165-.
Horace's Pindaric Apollo.John F. Miller - 1998 - Classical Quarterly 48 (2):545-552.
Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds?Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.
Late-Medieval Natural Philosophy - Some Recent Trends in Scholarship.J. M. M. H. Thijssen - 2000 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 67 (1):158-190.
How natural can ontology be?Sharon L. Crasnow - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):114-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
8 (#1,243,760)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?