Gigantomachy and Natural Philosophy

Classical Quarterly 29 (01):165- (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Augustan poets refer curiously often to the possible composition of a Gigantomachy, as in Prop. 2.1 and 3.9, Ov. Am. 2.1.11 ff., Trist. 2.61 ff. and 331 ff., and the future study of natural philosophy, as in Verg. Georg. 2.475 ff. and Prop. 3.5.25 ff. These ambitions are rejected, abandoned, or firmly set in the future. I suggest that the function of both is closely similar since they provide traditionally sublime themes to contrast the poet's present ‘humbler’’ task

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Locke and natural philosophy.Peter R. Anstey - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Natural pragmatics and natural codes.Tim Wharton - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):447–477.
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.
Referring to Natural Kind Thingamajigs, and What They Are: A Reply to Needham.Alexander Bird - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):103-109.
The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages.Edward Grant - 2010 - Catholic University of America Press.
Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds?Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):167-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?