Mechanisms, coherence, and theory choice in the cognitive neurosciences

In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 70-80 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Mechanisms, coherence, and theory choice in the cognitive neurosciences.Stephan Hartmann - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Mechanisms, Coherence, and Theory Choice in the Cognitive Neurosciences.Stephan Hartmann - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 70-80.
Peter K. Machamer, Rick Grush and Peter McLaughlin, eds., Theory and Method in the Neurosciences Reviewed by.Pierre Poirier & Luc Faucher - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (6):422-424.
Cognitive neuroscienec: Relating neural mechanisms and cognition.William P. Bechtel - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (4):584-588.
Discovering mechanisms in neurobiology: The case of spatial memory.Carl F. Craver & Lindley Darden - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 112--137.
On the nature of explanation in the neurosciences.Antti Revonsuo - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 45--69.
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. MachamerPeter (ed.) - 2001
The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences.H. Cruse - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 138--154.
Theory-confirmation and history.Colin Cheyne & John Worrall - 2006 - In Colin Cheyne & John Worrall (eds.), Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Springer. pp. 31-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-16

Downloads
4 (#1,645,937)

6 months
3 (#1,208,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Machamer
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references