Theory and Method in the Neurosciences

Philosophy of Science 68 (4):584-588 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/392948

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peter K. Machamer, Rick Grush and Peter McLaughlin, eds., Theory and Method in the Neurosciences Reviewed by.Pierre Poirier & Luc Faucher - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (6):422-424.
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences.Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.) - 2001 - Pittsburgh University Press.
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. MachamerPeter (ed.) - 2001
The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences.H. Cruse - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 138--154.
On the nature of explanation in the neurosciences.Antti Revonsuo - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 45--69.
Under the Lamppost.Marcel Weber - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 231.
Extrapolation from Animal Models.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 200.
A Neurological Perspective.Paul-Walter Schoenle - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 250.
Functional imaging evidence: Some epistemic hotspots.James Bogen - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 173--199.
Philosophy and the Neurosciences: A Reader.William P. Bechtel, Pete Mandik, Jennifer Mundale & Robert S. Stufflebeam (eds.) - 2001 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Consciousness: A neurological perspective.P. W. Schoenle & K. Schmeider - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Theory structure in neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Cognitive neuroscienec: Relating neural mechanisms and cognition.William P. Bechtel - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press.
Mechanisms, Coherence, and Theory Choice in the Cognitive Neurosciences.Stephan Hartmann - 2001 - In Peter McLaughlin, Peter Machamer & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 70-80.
La peau de l''me: intelligence artificielle, neurosciences, philosophie, théologie.Michel Simon (ed.) - 1994 - Paris: Cerf.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-19

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gualtiero Piccinini
University of Missouri, St. Louis

Citations of this work

Marr on computational-level theories.Oron Shagrir - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (4):477-500.
Functionalism, computationalism, and mental contents.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):375-410.
The Brain as an Input–Output Model of the World.Oron Shagrir - 2018 - Minds and Machines 28 (1):53-75.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.

Add more references