Goods, Interests and the Language of Morals

In Andrius Bielskis & Kelvin Knight (eds.), Virtue and Economy. Essays on Morality and Markets. Boulder: Ashgate (2015)

Authors
Piotr Machura
University Of Silesia In Katowice
Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to examine tentatively the difference between two kinds of moral frameworks based on the concepts of the good and that of interest. I shall start with some introductory remarks on language taken as an explanatory framework rooted in Gadamer and a hermeneutical reading of MacIntyre. In parts two and three, I use this hermeneutical background to analyse the difference between the concept of the good as seen within the classical tradition and that of interest as it came up with the turn of modernity. I also deal with some consequences of this distinction for ethics. Finally, in part four I discuss the possibilities of using the Aristotelian idea of the ethical in a contemporary social and philosophical context. I argue for the necessity of including some references to developed economics by pointing out those aspects of Martha Nussbaum’s and Amartya Sen’s projects, which promote a conception of the good within liberal economics.
Keywords neo-Aristotelianism  the good  Alasdair MacIntyre  interest  ethics  economis  language of morals
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotelianism Versus Communitarianism.Kelvin Knight - 2005 - Analyse & Kritik 27 (2):259-273.
The Language of Rights: Towards an Aristotelian-Thomistic Analysis.Michael Baur - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:89-98.
The Good as Means and as End.W. F. Lofthouse - 1941 - Philosophy 16 (64):372 - 385.
Interview - Alasdair MacIntyre.Alasdair MacIntyre - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):47-48.
The Common Good, Rights, and Catholic Social Thought: Prolegomena to Any Future Account of Common Goods.Jeffery L. Nicholas - 2015 - Solidarity: The Journal for Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics 5 (1):Article 4.
Moral Vision: Iris Murdoch and Alasdair Maclntyre. [REVIEW]Michael Schwartz - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S3):315 - 327.
What's the Good of Post-Analytic Philosophy?Kelvin Knight - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (3):304-314.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-16

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes