Using a biomarker acutely to identify babies at risk of serious adverse effects from antibiotics: where is the ‘Terrible Moral and Medical Dilemma’?
Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):117-118 (2021)
Abstract
We thank Parker and Wright for engaging in this roundtable debate in such a spirited way. The ‘Pharmacogenetic [test] to Avoid Loss of Hearing’ Trial is the first time a genetic point of care test has been applied in the acute neonatal setting; therefore, it is not surprising that questions have been raised which require debate, discussion and clarification. Parker and Wright misattribute several assumptions to the roundtable authors, which we would like to clarify here. Since they raise wider questions about the PALOH trial itself, several of the roundtable discussants have made a joint response.DOI
10.1136/medethics-2020-107048
My notes
Similar books and articles
Terrible choices in the septic child: a response to the PALOH trial round table authors.Joshua Parker & David Wright - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):114-116.
Genetic testing in the acute setting: a round table discussion.John Henry McDermott - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):531-532.
Great idea: what a fuss about a swab.Margot R. Brazier - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):534-535.
Using biomarkers in acute medicine to prevent hearing loss: should this require specific consent?Peta Coulson-Smith & Anneke Lucassen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):536-537.
Imposed separation of conjoined twins-- moral hubris by the English courts?R. Gillon - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):3-4.
The Duty to Disclose Adverse Clinical Trial Results.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):24-32.
The ethics of prophylactic antibiotics for neurosurgical procedures.S. I. Savitz - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):358-363.
Disclosing Clinical Trial Results: Publicity, Significance and Independence.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):3-5.
Bacterial Baptism: Scientific, Medical, and Regulatory Issues Raised by Vaginal Seeding of C-Section-Born Babies.Noel T. Mueller, Suchitra K. Hourigan, Diane E. Hoffmann, Lauren Levy, Erik C. von Rosenvinge, Betty Chou & Maria-Gloria Dominguez-Bello - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (4):568-578.
Dual loyalty in military medical ethics: a moral dilemma or a test of integrity?Peter Olsthoorn - 2019 - Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 165 (4):282-283.
Biomarker Validation: Context and Complexities.Lisa M. McShane - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (3):388-392.
Rethinking risk assessment for emerging technology first-in-human trials.Anna Genske & Sabrina Engel-Glatter - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (1):125-139.
Pulling the heartstrings, arguing the case: a narrative response to the issue of moral agency in moral distress.A. Walsh - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):746-749.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-24
Downloads
5 (#1,170,170)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2020-12-24
Downloads
5 (#1,170,170)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Genetic testing in the acute setting: a round table discussion.John Henry McDermott - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):531-532.
Using biomarkers in acute medicine to prevent hearing loss: should this require specific consent?Peta Coulson-Smith & Anneke Lucassen - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):536-537.
Genetic testing in the acute setting: a round table discussion.William G. Newman - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):533-533.
Terrible choices in the septic child: a response to the PALOH trial round table authors.Joshua Parker & David Wright - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):114-116.