Moral Decision-making as Compared to Economic and Shopping Contexts. Gender Effects and Utilitarianism
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 10 (1):49-64 (2019)
Abstract
: How do people make decisions? Previous psychological research consistently shed light on the fact that decisions are not the result of a pure rational reasoning, and that emotions can assume a crucial role. This is particularly true in the case of moral decision-making, which requires a complex integration of affective and cognitive processes. One question that is still open to debate concern the individual factors that can affect moral decisions. Gender has been consistently identified as a possible variable of interest for the adoption of different strategic behaviors, with men using more rational processes and women more deontological principles. In the present study we aimed at exploring the presence of gender differences in different decision-making scenarios. Results showed that the moral scenario led to a similar acceptance rate in both genders, while economic and shopping offers were more likely to be accepted by men. Also, women were more inclined to refuse unfair offers, which included a higher personal benefit at the expense of the opponent, even if this meant a total loss for both parties. Finally, correlational analyses revealed a different relation between risk propensity and decision-making in men and women in different scenarios. Keywords: Decision-making; Utilitarianism; Altruism; Moral Decision-making; Economic Decision-making Decisioni morali, economiche e d’acquisto a confronto. Effetti di genere e utilitarismo Riassunto: Come prendiamo le decisioni? La letteratura psicologica disponibile ha chiarito in ampia misura come le decisioni non siano il risultato di un ragionamento puramente razionale e che le emozioni possono assumere un ruolo cruciale. Questo è particolarmente vero nel caso delle decisioni morali, che richiedono una complessa integrazione tra processi affettivi e cognitivi. Una questione ancora aperta riguarda i fattori individuali che possono incidere sulle decisioni morali. Il genere è stato identificato come una possibile variabile da considerare rispetto all’adozione di comportamenti strategici differenti, in cui gli uomini sembrano più inclini a far uso di processi razionali e le donne a considerare principi deontologici. In questo lavoro abbiamo provato a esplorare la presenza di differenze di genere in diversi contesti decisionali. I risultati hanno mostrano come in ambito morale entrambi i generi siano portati ad accettare opzioni simili, mentre offerte economiche e commerciali sono accettate in misura maggiore dagli uomini. Le donne sarebbero più inclini a rifiutare offerte inique che comprendono benefici personali maggiori a discapito di una controparte, anche se questo implica una perdita totale da ambo le parti. Infine, le analisi correlazionali hanno mostrato una diversa relazione tra propensione al rischio e processi decisionali tra uomini e donne in contesti diversi. Parole chiave: Processi decisionali; Utilitarismo; Altruismo; Processi decisionali morali; Processi decisionali economiciAuthor's Profile
DOI
10.4453/rifp.2019.0004
My notes
Similar books and articles
Strategic and Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing: The Influence of Cognitive Moral Development and Cognitive Style.Dennis Brien Arnett - 1998 - Dissertation, Texas Tech University
An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making.Joseph G. P. Paolillo & Scott J. Vitell - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):65 - 74.
Shared decision-making, gender and new technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Reasons-based moral judgment and the erotetic theory.Philipp Koralus & Mark Alfano - 2017 - In Jean-Francois Bonnefon & Bastian Tremoliere (eds.), Moral Inference.
Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
Is decision style related to moral development among managers in the U.s.?Clare M. Pennino - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):337 - 347.
The Role of Four Universal Moral Competencies in Ethical Decision-Making.Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Carmen Cabello-Medina - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (4):717-734.
Emotions and reasoning in the moral decision making.V. V. Nadurak - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 10:24-32.
How Can a Deontological Decision Lead to Moral Behavior? The Moderating Role of Moral Identity.Zhi Xing Xu & Hing Keung Ma - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 137 (3):537-549.
Individual Differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty?Colin J. Palmer, Bryan Paton, Trung T. Ngo, Richard H. Thomson, Jakob Hohwy & Steven M. Miller - 2012 - Neuroethics 6 (1):97-103.
Emotions and reasoning in moral decision making.V. V. Nadurak - 2016 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 10:24-32.
Ethical Decision-Making of Accounting Students: Evidence from an Australian Setting.Shireenjit Johl, Beverley Jackling & Grace Wong - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 9:51-78.
Ethical Decision-Making of Accounting Students: Evidence from an Australian Setting.Shireenjit Johl, Beverley Jackling & Grace Wong - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 9:51-78.
Should age be a deciding factor in ethical decision-making?Robert K. Pretzlaff - 2005 - Health Care Analysis 13 (2):119-128.
Towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision-making.Elke U. Weber & Jessica S. Ancker - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):563-564.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-05-01
Downloads
5 (#1,169,683)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
2019-05-01
Downloads
5 (#1,169,683)
6 months
1 (#450,425)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements.Michael Koenigs, Liane Young, Ralph Adolphs, Daniel Tranel, Fiery Cushman, Marc Hauser & Antonio Damasio - 2007 - Nature 446 (7138):908-911.
Psicologia del consumo e neuroscienze.Gabriella Pracettoni & Claudio Lucchiari - 2014 - Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience 4:89-118.