Apeiron 44 (4):307-325 (2011)

Tim Loughrist
University of North Alabama
In Physics IV 14, 223a16-223a29 Aristotle raises two questions: (Q1) How is time related to the soul? (Q2) Why is time thought to be in everything? Aristotle's juxtaposition of these questions indicates some relation between them. I argue that Aristotle is committed to the claim that time only exists where change is countable. Aristotle must answer (Q2) in a way that doesn't conflict with this commitment. Aristotle's answer to (Q1) offers him such a way. Since time is change qua countable, time is dependent on souls capable of counting. But the thing that time is, change, is not so dependent. Likewise, time is not located in everything, but change, the substratum of time, is. This answers (Q2) in a way that's compatible with Aristotle's commitments.
Keywords Aristotle  Time  Physics IV
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/apeiron.2011.018
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

About Time for Aristotle. [REVIEW]Stephen Makin - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):280–293.
Aristotle’s Definition of Time Is Not Circular.Tony Roark - 2003 - Ancient Philosophy 23 (2):301-318.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
190 ( #60,500 of 2,498,303 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #36,134 of 2,498,303 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes