Hare’s Theory of Rational Assent

Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 28:238-244 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

05540739

DOI

10.5840/philstudies19812856

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

From Universal Prescriptivism to Utilitarianism.James W. McGray - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12 (142):79-86.
Assent and permission rejoinder.Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):345 – 347.
The refusal or deferral of Royal assent.Anne Twomey - manuscript
Hare's defense of utilitarianism.Thomas L. Carson - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
Reports of assent and permission in research with children: Illustrations and suggestions.Lillian M. Range & C. Randy Cotton - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):49 – 66.
Philosophical remarks on Peter Hare.John J. McDermott - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
Review: Hare, John E., God and Morality: A Philosophical History. [REVIEW]Robert Gressis - 2007 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (11).
Hare on supervenience: Remarks on R.m. Hare's Supervenience.A. J. Dale - 1985 - Mind 94 (October):599-600.
Book Review:Essays on Political Morality. R. M. Hare; Essays in Ethical Theory. R. M. Hare. [REVIEW]Nick Fotion - 1990 - Ethics 100 (4):889-.
What Makes Choices Rational?R. M. Hare - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (4):623 - 637.
Disquotation and Substitutivity.Bryan Frances - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):519-25.
Why Kant could not have been a utilitarian.Jens Timmermann - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (3):243-264.
Response to “Abortion and Assent” by Rosamond Rhodes (CQ Vol 8, No 4) and “Abortion, Disability, Assent, and Consent” by Matti Häyry (CQ Vol 10, No 1) Assent and Selective Abortion: A Response to Rhodes and Häyry. [REVIEW]Simo Vehmas - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):433-440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
24 (#656,297)

6 months
4 (#787,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references