Does the Public Intellectual Have Intellectual Integrity?

Metaphilosophy 33 (5):521-534 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is concerned with the devaluation of the work of public intellectuals within the academic community. The principal reason given for this devaluation is that the work of the public intellectual does not have intellectual integrity as independent thought and original scholarship. I develop three models of public intellectual work: the permanent–critic model, the popularizer model, and the public–theorist model. I then consider each model in relation to the concern with intellectual integrity and conclude that both independent thought and original scholarship are possible within work that is engaged with nonacademic publics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
71 (#232,616)

6 months
13 (#201,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Martín Alcoff
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Field Philosophy and Social Justice.Evelyn Brister - 2021 - Social Epistemology 35 (4):393-404.
Integrity.Damian Cox - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references