Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):27-42 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
Philosophers have talked to each other about moral issues concerning technology, but few of them have talked about issues of technology and the good life, and even fewer have talked about technology and the good life with the public in the form of recommendation. In effect, recommendations for various technologies are often left to technologists and gurus. Given the potential benefits of informing the public on their impacts on the good life, however, this is a curious state of affairs. In the present paper, I will examine why philosophers are seemingly reluctant to offer recommendations to the public. While there are many reasons for philosophers to refrain from offering recommendations, I shall focus on a specific normative reason. More specifically, it appears that, according to a particular definition, offering recommendations can be viewed as paternalistic, and therefore is prima facie wrong to do so. I will provide an argument to show that the worry about paternalism is unfounded, because a form of paternalism engendered by technology is inevitable. Given the inevitability of paternalism, I note that philosophers should accept the duty to offer recommendations to the public. I will then briefly turn to design ethics, which has reconceptualised the role of philosophers and, in my mind, fitted well with the inevitability of paternalism. Finally, I shall argue that design ethics has to be supplemented by the practice of recommendation if it is to sustain its objective
Keywords Paternalism  Recommendation  Design ethics  Good life  Role of philosopher
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-011-9288-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Harm to Self.Joel Feinberg - 1986 - Oxford University Press, USA.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Do Artifacts Have Politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Not Road Ethics?Meshi Ori - 2020 - Theoria 86 (3):389-412.
Consenting to Geoengineering.Pak-Hang Wong - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (2):173-188.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Technology and the Good Life?Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) - 2000 - University of Chicago Press.
A Trust-Based Argument Against Paternalism.Simon R. Clarke - 2013 - In Pekka Makela & Cynthia Townley (eds.), Trust: Analytic and Applied Persectives. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. pp. 53-75.
The Normative Core of Paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):441-458.
Ethics and Technology Design.Anders Albrechtslund - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):63-72.
Ethical Issues in Interaction Design.Toni Robertson - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2):49-59.
A Definition of Paternalism.Simon Clarke - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):81-91.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-02

Total views
87 ( #133,927 of 2,506,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,087 of 2,506,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes