Experimenting with Engagement: Commentary on: Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):817-821 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social scientists can explore questions about what counts as knowledge and how researchers—including social science researchers—can produce that knowledge. An art/space installation examining issues of public participation in science demonstrates the process of co-creation of knowledge about public participation, not simply the co-creation of the meaning of the installation itself

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-011-9328-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary on: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Balance Between Expertise and Authority in Citizen Engagement About New Biotechnology.David Castle - 2006 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9 (3):1-13.
Experimenting on and experimenting with: Polywater and experimental realism.William J. Mckinney - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):295-307.
Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. [REVIEW]Charles Thorpe - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):389-411.
Avoiding empty rhetoric: Engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.Renee Kyle & Susan Dodds - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):81-96.
Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.Brice Laurent - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):649-666.
Engagement Agents in the Making: On the Front Lines of Socio-Technical Integration: Commentary on: “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies”.Shannon N. Conley - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):715-721.
Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes: Commentary on: “What Happens in the Lab Does Not Stay in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory”.Brian Wynne - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):791-800.
Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-scribing Publics in Public Engagement.Ulrike Felt & Maximilian Fochler - 2010 - Minerva 48 (3):219-238.
The laboratory revisited.Robert Doubleday - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):167-176.
Philosophers and the public policy process: Inside, outside, or nowhere at all?Richard W. Momeyer - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (4):391-409.
Towards more confidence: about the roles of social scientists in participatory policy making.Corinna Jung - 2009 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):125-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-18

Downloads
26 (#605,520)

6 months
5 (#626,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Lewenstein
Cornell University

Citations of this work

Editorial Overview.Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking Our Own Medicine: On an Experiment in Science Communication.Maja Horst - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):801-815.

Add more references