Non-Euclidean sex

Think 4 (10):7-20 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Perhaps there is nothing morally wrong with homosexuality. But does that mean that those who find it abhorrent should be forced to tolerate, it? Michael Levin questions some common liberal preconceptions about homosexuality, and also responds to my own (which appeared in Issue 5 of Think)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Euclidean Functions of Computable Euclidean Domains.Rodney G. Downey & Asher M. Kach - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):163-172.
Michael Levin on gay sex.Thomas Riggins - 2005 - Think 4 (11):97-100.
Why Homosexuality is Abnormal.Michael Levin - 1984 - The Monist 67 (2):251-283.
Homosexuality, Abnormality, and Civil Rights.Michael Levin - 1996 - Public Affairs Quarterly 10 (1):31-48.
Kant and non-euclidean geometry.Amit Hagar - 2008 - Kant Studien 99 (1):80-98.
Euclides ab omni naevo vindicatus.J. R. Lucas - 1969 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-11.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
71 (#229,710)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references