Did lobachevsky have a model of his "imaginary geometry"?

Abstract

Lobachevsky's Imaginary geometry in its original form involved an extension of rather than a radical departure from Euclidean intuition. It wasn't anything like a formal theory in Hilbert's sense and hence didn't require anything like a model. However, rather surprisingly, Lobachevsky uses what in modern terms can be called a non-standard model of Euclidean plane, namely as a specific surface (a horisphere) in a Hyperbolic space. In this paper I critically review some popular accounts of the discovery of Non-Euclidean geometries and suggest a revision of the epistemic view on the issue dating back to Hilbert's Grundlagen.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#217,614)

6 months
5 (#632,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrei Rodin
Russian Academy of Sciences

References found in this work

Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung (Summary).Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Philosophical Review 1 (5):574-575.
Toposes and Local Set Theories. An Introduction.J. L. Bell - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (2):886-887.
On the origins of David Hilbert's?Grundlagen der Geometrie?Michael Toepell - 1986 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 35 (4):329-344.

Add more references