Upward categoricity from a successor cardinal for tame abstract classes with amalgamation

Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):639-660 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the proof of the following upward categoricity theorem: Let

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Categoricity in abstract elementary classes with no maximal models.Monica VanDieren - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 141 (1):108-147.
Categoricity for abstract classes with amalgamation.Saharon Shelah - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 98 (1-3):261-294.
Examples of non-locality.John T. Baldwin & Saharon Shelah - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3):765-782.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
10 (#1,189,467)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Abstract elementary classes stable in ℵ0.Saharon Shelah & Sebastien Vasey - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (7):565-587.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward categoricity for classes with no maximal models.Saharon Shelah & Andrés Villaveces - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 97 (1-3):1-25.
Set Theory.Thomas Jech - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):300-300.
Amalgamation properties and finite models in L n -theories.John Baldwin & Olivier Lessmann - 2002 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (2):155-167.
Finite diagrams stable in power.Saharon Shelah - 1970 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (1):69-118.

Add more references