On Absoluteness of Categoricity in Abstract Elementary Classes

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (4):395-402 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shelah has shown that $\aleph_1$-categoricity for Abstract Elementary Classes (AECs) is not absolute in the following sense: There is an example $K$ of an AEC (which is actually axiomatizable in the logic $L(Q)$) such that if $2^{\aleph_0}

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The categoricity spectrum of pseudo-elementary classes.Michael Chris Laskowski - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (3):332-347.
Elementary classes in basic modal logic.Holger Sturm - 2000 - Studia Logica 64 (2):193-213.
Types in Abstract Elementary Classes.Tapani Hyttinen - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):99-108.
Notes on quasiminimality and excellence.John T. Baldwin - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):334-366.
Categoricity and indefinite extensibility.James Walmsley - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):217–235.
Categoricity and ranks.Jürgen Saffe - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1379-1392.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-05

Downloads
24 (#603,118)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

An example related to Gregory’s Theorem.J. Johnson, J. F. Knight, V. Ocasio & S. VanDenDriessche - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (3-4):419-434.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references