4 found
Order:
  1.  14
    Independence in finitary abstract elementary classes.Tapani Hyttinen & Meeri Kesälä - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 143 (1-3):103-138.
    In this paper we study a specific subclass of abstract elementary classes. We construct a notion of independence for these AEC’s and show that under simplicity the notion has all the usual properties of first order non-forking over complete types. Our approach generalizes the context of 0-stable homogeneous classes and excellent classes. Our set of assumptions follow from disjoint amalgamation, existence of a prime model over 0/, Löwenheim–Skolem number being ω, -tameness and a property we call finite character. We also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  2.  41
    Categoricity transfer in simple finitary abstract elementary classes.Tapani Hyttinen & Meeri Kesälä - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (3):759 - 806.
    We continue our study of finitary abstract elementary classes, defined in [7]. In this paper, we prove a categoricity transfer theorem for a case of simple finitary AECs. We introduce the concepts of weak κ-categoricity and f-primary models to the framework of א₀-stable simple finitary AECs with the extension property, whereby we gain the following theorem: Let (������, ≼ ������ ) be a simple finitary AEC, weakly categorical in some uncountable κ. Then (������, ≼ ������ ) is weakly categorical in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3. Lascar Types and Lascar Automorphisms in Abstract Elementary Classes.Tapani Hyttinen & Meeri Kesälä - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):39-54.
    We study Lascar strong types and Galois types and especially their relation to notions of type which have finite character. We define a notion of a strong type with finite character, the so-called Lascar type. We show that this notion is stronger than Galois type over countable sets in simple and superstable finitary AECs. Furthermore, we give an example where the Galois type itself does not have finite character in such a class.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  11
    Interpreting groups and fields in simple, finitary AECs.Tapani Hyttinen & Meeri Kesälä - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (9):1141-1162.