Physics of Aristotle and Physics of Leibniz

Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 60:25-29 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The scientific revolution of the 17th century was characterized by rejection of Aristotle’s method of cognition of Nature for the sake of a new experimental and mathematical method. However, Leibniz, the great physicist and philosopher, reverts to Aristotle’s principles. Why? The article explores the problem and gives answers to the following questions: 1) What are the principles of Aristotelian physics? 2) Why did Aristotelian physics predominate for two centuries? 3) What is the reason for rejecting it? 4) Why was Leibniz interested in Aristotle’s physics? 5) What is Leibniz’s attitude to Aristotle’s physics? Leibniz agrees on many issues with Descartes and Galilei in their dispute with Aristotle, especially regarding their interpretation of the laws of Nature as established by God. Still Leibniz partly agrees with Aristotle. There are several reasons for this. Firstly, it is necessary to analyze the conception of force, introduced to physics by Newton, in terms of Metaphysics. In Leibniz’s view, the Aristotelian conception of entelechy gives a clear insight into the notion of force. Secondly, Leibniz as well as Aristotle deny the existence of vacuum. Thirdly, Aristotle’s teaching is in better keeping with Christianity, because it affirms the existence of final causes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy and Science in Leibniz.Maria Rosa Antognazza - 2016 - In L. Strickland, E. Vynckier & J. Weckend (eds.), Tercentenary Essays on the Philosophy & Science of G.W. Leibniz. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 19-46.
Aristotle’s Physics 5.1, 225a1-b5.John Bowin - 2019 - Philosophical Inquiry 43:147-164.
The Status of Laws of Nature in the Philosophy of Leibniz.Karen R. Zwier - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:149-160.
Leibniz and the vis viva controversy.Idan Shimony - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 51-73.
Commentary on physics. Thomas, Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Sparth, W. Edmund Thirlkel & Pierre Conway - 2020 - Green Bay, WI: Aquinas Institute/Emmaus Academic. Edited by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Sparth, W. Edmund Thirlkel & Pierre Conway.
Aristotle's Physics and Cosmology.István Bodnár & Pierre Pellegrin - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 270–291.
On Aristotle's "Physics 1.1-3".John Philoponus & Catherine Osborne - 2006 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Catherine Osborne.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
5 (#1,561,562)

6 months
4 (#863,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references