In L. Strickland, E. Vynckier & J. Weckend (eds.), Tercentenary Essays on the Philosophy & Science of G.W. Leibniz. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 19-46 (2016)

Abstract
This paper explores the question of Leibniz’s contribution to the rise of modern ‘science’. To be sure, it is now generally agreed that the modern category of ‘science’ did not exist in the early modern period. At the same time, this period witnessed a very important stage in the process from which modern science eventually emerged. My discussion will be aimed at uncovering the new enterprise, and the new distinctions which were taking shape in the early modern period under the banner of the old Aristotelian terminology. I will argue that Leibniz begins to theorize a distinction between physics and metaphysics that tracks our distinction between the autonomous enterprise of science in its modern meaning, and the enterprise of philosophy. I will try to show that, for Leibniz, physics proper is the study of natural phenomena in mathematical and mechanical terms without recourse for its explanations to metaphysical notions. This autonomy, however, does not imply for Leibniz that physics can say on its own all that there is to be said about the natural world. Quite the opposite. Leibniz inherits from the Aristotelian tradition the view that physics needs metaphysical roots or a metaphysical grounding. For Leibniz, what is ultimately real is reached by metaphysics, not by physics. This is, in my view, Leibniz’s chief insight: the new mathematical physics is an autonomous enterprise which offers its own kind of explanations but does not exhaust what can (and should) be said about the natural world.
Keywords Leibniz  Philosophy and Science  Metaphysics and Physics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphysics and the New Science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David Lindberg & Robert Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.
Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton.Andrew Janiak - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):403-417.
Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and Galileo.Blake D. Dutton - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):49-71.
Physics and Metaphysics in Newton, Leibniz, and Clarke.Margula R. Perl - 1969 - Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (4):507.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on the Metaphysical Foundation of Physics.Daniel R. Temple - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Leibniz and the Metaphysics of Motion.Edward Slowik - 2013 - Journal of Early Modern Studies 2 (2):56-77.
Leibniz's Metaphysics.John Cottingham - 1993 - History of European Ideas 17 (2-3):360-362.
Leibniz's Philosophy of Physics.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz.Nicholas Jolley (ed.) - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
Leibniz on Form and Matter.Daniel Garber - 1997 - Early Science and Medicine 2 (3):326-351.
The Status of Laws of Nature in the Philosophy of Leibniz.Karen R. Zwier - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:149-160.
Leibniz and Newton on Space.Ori Belkind - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
Leibniz, God and Necessity.Michael V. Griffin - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-02

Total views
401 ( #25,281 of 2,518,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #30,322 of 2,518,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes