I Am Not the Zygote I Came from because a Different Singleton Could Have Come from It

Philosophical Review 131 (3):295-325 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many people believe that human beings begin to exist with the emergence of the 1-cell zygote at fertilization. I present a novel argument against this belief, one based on recently discovered facts about human embryo development. I first argue that a human zygote is developmentally plastic: A zygote that naturally develops into a singleton (i.e., develops into exactly one infant/adult without twinning) might have naturally developed into a numerically different singleton. From this, I derive the conclusion that a human infant or adult is numerically distinct from the zygote she came from and so did not begin to exist at fertilization. This implies that a zygote does not have a “future like ours” and strongly suggests that it is not a human being.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-06

Downloads
255 (#83,037)

6 months
45 (#96,012)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chunghyoung Lee
Pohang University of Science and Technology

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Material Beings.Peter Van Inwagen - 1990 - Philosophy 67 (259):126-127.
Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Existence.Nathan Salmon - 1987 - Philosophical Perspectives 1:49-108.
Sixteen days.Barry Smith & Berit Brogaard - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):45 – 78.
The Virtues: The Stanton Lectures 1973-4.Peter Geach - 1977 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (4):252-253.

View all 14 references / Add more references