Re-enfranchising Art: Feminist Interventions in the Theory of Art

Hypatia 5 (2):91-106 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist analyses of the roles gender has played in art lead to an alternative theory that emphasizes art's complex interactions with culture(s) rather than the autonomy within culture claimed for it by formalism. Focusing on the visual arts, I extrapolate the new theory from feminist research and compare it with formalist precepts. Sharing Arthur Danto's concern that art has been disenfranchised in the twentieth century by its preoccupation with theory, I claim that feminist thought re-enfranchises art by revisioning its relationship to its contexts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
46 (#336,982)

6 months
4 (#1,006,062)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Feminist Aesthetics.Carolyn Korsmeyer & Peg Weiser - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Dangers of "Pure Feeling": A Warning to Feminist Interpretations of Hans-Georg Gadamer.Sinéad Murphy - 2014 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 16 (1):92-108.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
The philosophical disenfranchisement of art.Arthur Coleman Danto - 1986 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The Verbal Icon.W. K. Wimsatt - 1955 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (3):414-414.
The historicity of aesthetics — I.Arnold Berleant - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (2):101-111.
In the World: An Art Essay.Josephine Withers - 1983 - Feminist Studies 9 (2):325.

View all 8 references / Add more references