- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The ethics of shared decision making
John D. Lantos (ed.)
New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2021)
Abstract
There are some paradoxes in the way doctors and patients make medical decisions today. Today's patients are more empowered than were patients in the past. They have the right to see their medical records. The law requires doctors to obtain their informed consent for treatment. Patients are told about the options for treatment and the risks and benefits of each option. Their values and preferences are elucidated in order to guide the treatments that are provided.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Chapters
A Pragamatic Guide to Shared Decisionmaking in Pediatrics : A Justification and Concrete Steps.Jennifer Walter & Alexander Fiks
Role of Children and Adolescents in Decision Making about Life Threatening Illness.Victoria A. Miller & Melissa K. Cousino
Similar books and articles
Clinical Medical Ethics and the Historical Background of Shared Decision-Making.Mark Siegler - 2021 - In John D. Lantos (ed.), The ethics of shared decision making. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Deference to patients’ risk attitudes is contingent on medical norms.Abeezar I. Sarela - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (11):755-756.
Shared Decision-Making and the Lower Literate Patient.David I. Shalowitz & Michael S. Wolf - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):759-764.
Shared Decision-Making and the Lower Literate Patient.David I. Shalowitz & Michael S. Wolf - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (4):759-764.
An ethical approach to shared decision-making for adolescents with terminal illness.Hunter Smith, Vivian Altiery De Jesús, Margot Kelly-Hedrick, Cami Docchio, Joy Piotrowski & Zackary Berger - 2023 - Clinical Ethics 18 (2):264-270.
Medical decision-making and communication of risks: an ethical perspective.C. Breitsameter - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):349-352.
Certified Patient Decision Aids: Solving Persistent Problems with Informed Consent Law.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (1):12-40.
Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy.Peter A. Ubel, Karen A. Scherr & Angela Fagerlin - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):31-39.
Aligning Ethics with Medical Decision-Making: The Quest for Informed Patient Choice.Benjamin Moulton & Jaime S. King - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):85-97.
“Being Guided”: What Oncofertility Patients’ Decisions Can Teach Us about the Efficacy of Autonomy, Agency, and Decision- Making Theory in the Contemporary Clinical Encounter.Alexis Paton - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (2):18-35.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-12-01
Downloads
22 (#698,027)
6 months
13 (#277,486)
2022-12-01
Downloads
22 (#698,027)
6 months
13 (#277,486)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo