Response to Richard M. Gale's review of the book God, the Best, and Evil

Abstract

Richard M.Gale reviewed my book in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews in May 2009. The overall conclusion of my reply is that although Gale repeatedly claims that the book is defective, his review has not identified any genuine defects.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

God and metaphysics.Richard M. Gale - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Langtry on God, the Best and Evil: Review Discussion of Bruce Langtry, God, the Best and Evil, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-19-923879-8, hb, ix+237pp. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2010 - Sophia 49 (4):591-601.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.
Richard Gale and the Free Will Defense.Dean Zimmerman - 2003 - Philo 6 (1):78-113.
Gale on a Pragmatic Argument for Religious Belief.Philip L. Quinn - 2003 - Philo 6 (1):59-66.
Gale on Omnipotence.Theodore M. Drange - 2003 - Philo 6 (1):23-26.
Freedom and Evil.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What Philosophers Think. A&C Black.
William Hasker’s avoidance of the problems of evil and God. [REVIEW]D. Z. Phillips - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (1):33 - 42.
On the nature and existence of God.Richard M. Gale - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-06

Downloads
287 (#70,190)

6 months
65 (#74,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Langtry
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references