- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The nature of argument
Lanham [Md.]: University Press of America. Edited by William Ulrich (1980)
Abstract
The authors contend that most contemporary logic textbooks fail the average student because they emphasize the evaluation of arguments over their clarification, assuming that the student already understands what motivations underlie logicAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Nature of Argument.Karel Lambert & William Ulrich - 1980 - New York, NY, USA: Upa. Edited by William Ulrich.
Mind of Nature: Cavendish’s Argument for Panpsychism.Pedro Falcão Pricladnitzky - 2023 - In Ruth Edith Hagengruber (ed.), Women Philosophers on Economics, Technology, Environment, and Gender History: Shaping the Future, Rethinking the Past. De Gruyter. pp. 235-248.
Is there a human nature? : an argument against modern excarnation.Jean Bethke Elshtain - 2013 - In Michael J. Hyde & James A. Herrick (eds.), After the genome: a language for our biotechnological future. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.
Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic.Joel Rudinow - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Review: Karel Lambert, Meinong and the Principle of Independence. Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and Its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic. [REVIEW]William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):248-252.
Existence and Explanation: Essays presented in Honor of Karel Lambert.W. Spohn, B. C. Van Fraassen & B. Skyrms (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag.
Karel Lambert Free logic: Selected essays.G. Landini - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25:244-249.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
14 (#994,650)
6 months
5 (#837,573)
2009-01-28
Downloads
14 (#994,650)
6 months
5 (#837,573)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Justification and Argumentation.Krzysztof Szymanek - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):231-239.
Do we reason when we when we think we reason of think? [Spanish].David Miller - 2007 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 7:88-108.
Logical Fallacies as Codified Within the Conceptual System of the Lvov-Warsaw School.Marcin Koszowy - 2012 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 30 (43).
Persuasive argumentation as a cultural practice.Paweł GAŁKOWSKI - 2014 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 4 (1):123-134.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo