The Nature of Argument

New York, NY, USA: Upa. Edited by William Ulrich (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors contend that most contemporary logic textbooks fail the average student because they emphasize the evaluation of arguments over their clarification, assuming that the student already understands what motivations underlie logic.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The nature of argument.Karel Lambert - 1980 - Lanham [Md.]: University Press of America. Edited by William Ulrich.
The Argument of the Beard.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Modern cosmology - a cognitive approach God?Winfried Loffler - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (8):157-171.
On Keeping Logic in the Major.Jason Decker - 2010 - Teaching Philosophy 33 (2):133-142.
Gauge principles, gauge arguments and the logic of nature.Christopher A. Martin - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S221-S234.
Logic and its limits.Patrick Shaw - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Goedel's Ontological Argument.Randolph Rubens Goldman - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Arguing Well.John Shand - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
The 'intrinsic nature' argument for panpsychism.William E. Seager - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (10-11):129-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-30

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?