- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Linking of Spinoza to Chinese Thought by Bayle and Malebranche
Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (2):151 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The linking of Spinoza to chinese thought by Bayle and Malebranche.Yuen Ting Lai - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (2):151-178.
Spinoza, Bayle, and the Enlightenment Politics of Philosophical Certainty.Adam Sutcliffe - 2008 - History of European Ideas 34 (1):66-76.
Variations on the Theme of the Philosopher's God: Europe and China.Yuen Ting Tsui Lai - 1982 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Henry More and Nicolas Malebranche's Critiques of Spinoza.Jasper Reid - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):764-792.
Malebranche's First and Last Critics: Simon Foucher and Dortius de Mairan.Richard A. Watson & Marjorie Grene (eds.) - 1995 - Southern Illinois University.
On Bayle’s Interpretation of Spinoza’s Substance and Modes.A. Guilherme - 2009 - Conatus 3 (6):11-16.
Pierre Bayle's Cartesian Metaphysics: Rediscovering Early Modern Philosophy.Todd Ryan - 2009 - New York: Routledge.
Pierre Bayle’s Cartesian Metaphysics: Rediscovering Early Modern Philosophy.Robert Sparling - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (4):528-529.
Études sur Descartes, Spinoza, Malebranche, et Leibniz.Martial Guéroult - 1970 - New York,: G. Olms.
Ideas.Pauline Phemister - 2011 - In Desmond M. Clarke & Catherine Wilson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press.
L'idée d'étendue chez Malebranche et Spinoza ou pourquoi Malebranche n'était pas spinoziste.Syliane Charles - 1998 - Horizons Philosophiques 9 (1):33-49.
Spinoza’s Arguments for the Existence of God.Martin Lin - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-02-23
Downloads
24 (#650,558)
6 months
14 (#174,667)
2017-02-23
Downloads
24 (#650,558)
6 months
14 (#174,667)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Malebranche and Chinese Philosophy: A Reconsideration.Gregory M. Reihman - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):262 - 280.
The birth of enlightenment secularism from the spirit of Confucianism.Dawid Rogacz - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 28 (1):68-83.
Henry More and Nicolas Malebranche's Critiques of Spinoza.Jasper Reid - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):764-792.
Reconsidering the Problem of Evil: The International Context of the Early Modern Discussion1.Yu Liu - 2006 - The European Legacy 11 (1):21-33.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-gf2vn uwo