The Golden Rule: Aspects of Leibniz's Method for Religious Controversy

In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--297 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Leibniz and the vis viva controversy.Idan Shimony - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. Philadelphia / Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 51-73.
Leibniz's conciliatory approaches in scientific controversies.Marcelo Dascal & Erez Firt - 2010 - In The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--137.
Leibniz's critique of Pufendorf A dispute in the eve of the Enlightenment.Detlef Doring - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--245.
A controversy well beyond medicine and chemistry.Sarah Carvallo - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--101.
Mark Kulstad, Mogens Laerke, David Snyder (eds.), The Philosophy of the Young Leibniz.Federico Silvestri - 2011 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 66 (3):576.
Les Lumières de Leibniz: Controverses avec Huet, Bayle, Regis et More by Mogens Lærke. [REVIEW]Kristen Irwin - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):338-339.
Rule of Continuity and Infinitesimals in Leibniz’s Physics.François Duchesneau - 2008 - In Douglas Jesseph & Ursula Goldenbaum (eds.), Infinitesimal Differences: Controversies Between Leibniz and His Contemporaries. Walter de Gruyter.
MOGENS LÆRKE: Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza. La genèse d'une opposition complexe (= Travaux de philosophie 16).Ursula Goldenbaum - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):123.
Apology for a Credo Maximum: On Three Basic Rules in Leibniz's Method of Religious Controversy.Mogens Laerke - 2008 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? Springer. pp. 397--407.
Leibniz vs. Bossuet.Christiane Frémont - 2010 - In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies. John Benjamins. pp. 7--321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
33 (#500,033)

6 months
6 (#588,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references