The Moral Irrelevance of the Counterforce/Countervalue Distinction

The Monist 70 (3):255-275 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the atomic era began in 1945, there have been three waves of moral criticism directed at American nuclear weapons policies. The first wave, which began around 1957 and ended in 1962 with McNamara’s announcement of Flexible Response, focused on Dulles’s policy of Massive Retaliation. The second wave, which began in the early 70’s and ended in 1974 with Schlesinger’s announcement of Countervailing Response, focused on the Assured Destruction policy developed in McNamara’s later reports to Congress. The third wave began in the 80’s with Weinberger’s remarks about “prevailing” in nuclear conflicts and may or may not end with the next MX vote or next strategic arms agreement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
51 (#304,401)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Lackey
Baruch College (CUNY)

Citations of this work

Malum Vitandum: The role of intentions in first‐order morality.Thomas D. Sullivan & Gary Atkinson - 1993 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (1):99 – 110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references