Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons

Cambridge University Press (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

With the passing of the Cold War, a chapter in the history of nuclear deterrence has come to an end. Nuclear weapons remain, however, and nuclear deterrence will again be practiced. Rather than simply assume that the policy of deterrence has worked we need to learn the proper lessons from history in order to ensure that its mistakes are not repeated. Professor Lee furnishes us with the kind of analysis that will enable us to learn those lessons. This 1993 book is the first post-Cold War assessment of nuclear deterrence. It provides a comprehensive normative understanding of nuclear deterrence policy, examining both its ethical and strategic dimensions. The book poses the question: What kind of nuclear policy, if any, deserves both moral and prudential endorsement?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Morality and Paradoxical Deterrence.Steven Lee - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (1):136.
Optimal Deterrence.Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (1):118.
Conflicting Conceptions of Deterrence.Henry Shue - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (1):43.
An Examination of a Moral Argument against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven Lee
Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references