- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The projection postulate and the time-energy uncertainty relation
Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-15 (1992)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to solve a serious problem for the projection postulate involving the time-energy uncertainty relation. The problem was recently raised by Teller, who believes that the problem is insoluble and, consequently, that the projection postulate should no longer be regarded as a serious focus for interpretive investigationMy notes
Similar books and articles
Time as non‐observational knowledge: How to straighten out ΔEΔt≥h.Constantin Antonopoulos - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):165 – 183.
Is there really no projection postulate in the modal interpretation?W. Michael Dickson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.
The projection postulate as a fortuitous approximation.Paul Teller - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.
Quantum logic and the projection postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.
The Projection Postulate and Bohr's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Paul Teller - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:201-223.
Von Neumann's argument for the projection postulate.Joseph D. Sneed - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
A search for the physical content of luders' rule.Sergio Martinez - 1990 - Synthese 82 (1):97 - 125.
The reduction of phenomenological to kinetic thermostatics.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):107-119.
The projection postulate: A new perspective.Paul Teller - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395.
Quantum entanglement and nonideal measurements: A critique of Margenau's objections to the projection postulate.Frederick M. Kronz - 1991 - Synthese 89 (2):229 - 251.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#318,125)
6 months
7 (#430,488)
2009-01-28
Downloads
50 (#318,125)
6 months
7 (#430,488)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Quantum entanglement and nonideal measurements: A critique of Margenau's objections to the projection postulate.Frederick M. Kronz - 1991 - Synthese 89 (2):229 - 251.
References found in this work
Philosophical problems concerning the meaning of measurement in physics.Henry Margenau - 1958 - Philosophy of Science 25 (1):23-33.
Critical points in modern physical theory.Henry Margenau - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (3):337-370.
The projection postulate as a fortuitous approximation.Paul Teller - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):413-431.
Quantum entanglement and nonideal measurements: A critique of Margenau's objections to the projection postulate.Frederick M. Kronz - 1991 - Synthese 89 (2):229 - 251.
Book Review:The Nature of Physical Reality. Henry Margenau. [REVIEW]Manley H. Thompson Jr - 1951 - Ethics 61 (3):239-.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-cl5t5 uwo