The projection postulate: A new perspective

Philosophy of Science 51 (3):369-395 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Previous work has shown that the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics is not correctly seen as one of understanding some allegedly univocal process of measurement in nature which corresponds to the projection postulate. The present paper introduces a new perspective by showing that how we are to understand the nature of the change of quantum mechanical state on measurement depends very sensitively on the interpretation of the state function, and by showing how attention to this dependence can greatly sharpen the problems and relations between them. In particular, the problems take a form resembling their traditional formulation only on an inexact value interpretation, according to which the state function attributes inexact values of quantities to systems. On other interpretations we can apply (with various drawbacks) the subensemble idea, according to which a discontinuous change of quantum mechanical description results on measurement simply because we need a new state function to describe a new object

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#111,429)

6 months
22 (#694,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Quantum logic, realism, and value definiteness.Allen Stairs - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):578-602.
Schrödinger's interpretation of quantum mechanics and the relevance of Bohr's experimental critique.Slobodan Perovic - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (2):275-297.
Latency versus Complementarity: Margenau and Bohr on Quantum Mechanics.Harmon R. Holcomb - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):193-206.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.
Is Logic Empirical?Hilary Putnam - 1968 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5.
Probability and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Arthur Fine - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1-37.
Out of My Later Years.Albert Einstein - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):92-93.
Is probability a dispositional property?Lawrence Sklar - 1970 - Journal of Philosophy 67 (11):355-366.

View all 21 references / Add more references