Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion

Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley, helmholtz, the moon illusion, and two visual systems.Helen E. Ross - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):116-117.
Pursuit learning as affected by size of target and speed of rotation.John S. Helmick - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (2):126.
The Ponzo illusion in stereoscopic space.R. T. Greene, R. B. Lawson & Cynthia L. Godek - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):358.
Effect of size on visual slant.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):96.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
Perception of size.Aage Slomann - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):101 – 113.
Effect of self-satiation on perceived size of a visual figure.Carl P. Duncan - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2):130.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
18 (#829,320)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The Visual Brain in Action.David Milner & Mel Goodale - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
The visual brain in action (precis).David Milner - 1998 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 4.
The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):615-28.

View all 11 references / Add more references