Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus

Studia Humana 3 (2):3-31 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is the Dionysian God, or an experience of the Dionysian God, absolutely ineffable? Does the Dionysian corpus assert or perform such ineffability? This paper will argue that the answer to each of these questions is no. The Dionysian God is known hyper-nous as the hyper-ousia cause of all. And the Dionysian corpus unambiguously refers to, asserts of, and metaphorizes about this God just so. In arguing these points, this paper will call upon both the speech act theory of John Searle and the metaphor theory of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. More particularly, it will look to Searle’s rules of reference and predication and conditions of illocutionary acts, as well as Lakoff and Johnson’s schematization of metaphor gestalt and entailment to show how Dionysian expressions of inexpressibility are rule-governed and the Dionysian God is thereby effable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
26 (#599,290)

6 months
10 (#382,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Knepper
Drake University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - University of Chicago Press.
A Natural History of Negation.Laurence R. Horn - 1989 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (2):164-168.
Mysticism and semantics.Paul Henle - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (3):416-422.

Add more references