Response to Knepper

Religious Studies 45 (2):223-226 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Having cited Dionysius as one of the many Christian thinkers who affirm the ineffability, or transcategoriality, of God in God's ultimate inner being, I respond to Timothy D. Knepper's claim that this is a mistake. Whilst accepting much that he says about Dionysius, I still prefer the standard interpretation of the Dionysian texts as teaching the total transcategoriality of the Transcendent as 'surpassing all discourse and all knowledge'

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
Double Exile. [REVIEW]Paul Knepper - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (3):67-69.
A Response to John Hick.George I. Mavrodes - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):289-294.
Response to Hick.William P. Alston - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):287-288.
The many gods of Hick and Mavrodes.William Hasker - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
The fifth risk: A response to John Muckelbauer's response.Diane Davis - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (2):248-256.
New Voices: An Interview with PauI Knepper.Phil Mullins - 2007 - Tradition and Discovery 34 (2):26-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-23

Downloads
41 (#369,691)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references