- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Consent, Threats, and Offers
American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):66-68 (2019)
Abstract
Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 66-68.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent.John McMillan - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):596-596.
Coercion, Threats, and the Puzzle of Blackmail.Grant Lamond - 1996 - In A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.), Harm and Culpability. Oxford University Press. pp. 215-38.
When is a Choice not a Choice? ‘Sham Offers’ and the Asymmetry of Adolescent Consent and Refusal.Neil C. Manson - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (3):296-304.
How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.
The ethics of biobanking: Assessing the right to control problem for broad consent.Neil C. Manson - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (5):540-549.
Beyond Coercion: Moral Assessment in the Labour Market.Dan Munter & Lars Lindblom - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 142 (1):59-70.
Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Neil C. Manson - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Onora O'Neill.
Normative Consent and Authority.Daniel Koltonski - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (3):255-275.
Giving addicts their drug of choice: The problem of consent.Tom Walker - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):314–320.
Victimless Conduct and the Volenti Maxim: How Consent Works. [REVIEW]Michelle Madden Dempsey - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):11-27.
In defence of “hard” offers: A reply to J.p. Day.Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen - 1990 - Philosophia 20 (3):325-327.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-08-17
Downloads
20 (#763,203)
6 months
3 (#961,692)
2019-08-17
Downloads
20 (#763,203)
6 months
3 (#961,692)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How Payment for Research Participation Can Be Coercive”.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):W8-W11.
References found in this work
How Payment For Research Participation Can Be Coercive.Joseph Millum & Michael Garnett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):21-31.
Rethinking the ethics of clinical research: widening the lens.Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants.E. A. Largent, C. Grady, F. G. Miller & A. Wertheimer - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (1):1-8.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7986d74c8b-jzc7k uwo