In defence of “hard” offers: A reply to J.p. Day

Philosophia 20 (3):325-327 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In commenting on our earlier article in IPhilosophiaD, J P Day raises four issues: those concerning (1) the correct interpretation of the concept of "conditional offers," (2) the relationship of hard conditional offers to liberty, (3) the role of preferences in distinguishing offers from threats, and (4) the moral wrongness of some forms of offering. Two of these points, the second and the third, give rise to some further argument

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument.Kristin Mickelson - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Defeasible a priori justification: A reply to Thurow.Albert Casullo - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):336–343.
Reply to Crisp.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (1):109-114.
The validity of psychotherapy.B. A. Farrell - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):146 – 170.
Dorothy Day's Christian Conversion.June O'Connor - 1990 - Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (1):159 - 180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references