Abstract
This paper argues that G. Guldentops’s review of S. Ebbersmeyer’s Homo agens does not do justice to her wellgrounded and exemplarily structured study, which is a landmark in the research on early Renaissance moral philosophy. Among other aspects the paper focuses on the relation of early Italian humanists to the medieval scholastic tradition
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2143/RTPM.78.2.2141899
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kritische Studie - Die Frühhumanistische Moralphilosophie: Anfang der Moderne?Guy Guldentops - 2010 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 77 (2):391-413.
Die Dimensionen des Raumes. Eine kritische Studie.A. Kirschmann - 1903 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 55:202-209.
Eine kritische studie zu rahners „grundkurs Des glaubens”.Karlo Oedingen - 1978 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 40 (3):502 - 509.
Schopenhauer als philosoph der Tragödie Eine Kritische Studie.Emil Reich - 1889 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 27:191-193.
Hotter Frank Swinnerton und George Gissing. Eine kritische Studie. [REVIEW]F. Delatte - 1933 - Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 12 (1-2):213-213.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
5 ( #1,203,578 of 2,507,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes