Strong affirmative action programs and disproportionate burdens

Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (2):201-209 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Affirmative action programs are not justified by compensatory justice. They place a disproportionate burden on white-male applicants. White-male applicants do not owe compensation because they committed a relevant wrongdoing or because they benefitted from another’s wrongdoing. They did not commit a relevant wrongdoing. Receipt of an unjust benefit, when unavoidable and mixed with hard work, does not justify a duty to compensate a victim of the injustice. Thus, the compensatory-justice argument for affirmative action fails.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
10 (#395,257)

6 months
86 (#191,729)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Kershnar
Fredonia State University

Citations of this work

Affirmative action.Robert Fullinwider - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justifying reverse discrimination in employment.George Sher - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (2):159-170.
Justice and the Concept of Desert.James P. Sterba - 1976 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (2):188.

Add more references