I. The "Paradox" of Knowledge and Power: Reading Foucault on a Bias

Political Theory 15 (1):5-37 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What if thought freed itself from common sense and decided to think only at the extreme point of its singularity? What if it mischievously practiced the bias of paradox, instead of complacently accepting its citizenship in the doxa? What if it thought difference differentially, instead of searching out the common elements underlying difference?1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to Understand and Solve the Lottery Paradox.Patrick Bondy - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (3):283-292.
Self‐Knowledge, Rationality and Moore's Paradox.Jordi Fernández - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):533-556.
Fallibilism and the Lottery paradox.Baron Reed - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:217-225.
Comments on Moore's paradox and self-knowledge.Rogers Albritton - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):229-239.
A Pragmatic Dissolution of Harman’s Paradox.Igor Douven - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):326-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
14 (#988,032)

6 months
3 (#969,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critique and Experience in Foucault.Thomas Lemke - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (4):26-48.
Foucault, Rights and Freedom.Ben Golder - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):5-21.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references