Lexington Books (2015)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
This book is a comprehensive exposition of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories in both editions of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2019 |
| Buy this book | $39.12 new Amazon page |
| ISBN(s) | 9781498508483 9781498508506 1498508502 1498508480 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 71,316
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Kant's Subjective Deduction.Nathan Bauer - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2019 - Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Kant on Representation and Objectivity: An Essay on the B-Deduction.Adam Benjamin Dickerson - 2001 - Dissertation, University of New South Wales (Australia)
Unity of Apperception and the Division of Labour in the Transcendental Analytic.Richard E. Aquila - 1997 - Kantian Review 1:17-52.
Kant, Hume, and Problems of the Deduction of the Categories.V. V. Vasil'ev - 1996 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 34 (4):51-65.
The Function of Derivation and the Derivation of Functions: A Review of Schulting’s Kant’s Deduction and Apperception. [REVIEW]Corey W. Dyck - 2014 - Studi Kantiani:13-19.
Peirce, Kant, and Apel on Transcendental Semiotics: The Unity of Apperception and the Deduction of the Categories of Signs.Jerrold J. Abrams - 2004 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):627 - 677.
Between Wolff and Kant: Merian's Theory of Apperception.Udo Thiel - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):213-232.
Deducing the Categories of Modality and Relation - Reich Revisited.Dennis Schulting - 2008 - In Valerio Rohden, Riccardo Terra & Guido de Almeida (eds.), Akten des 10. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. de Gruyter. pp. 691--702.
Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):59-84.
Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
A Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Without the Categories.John Rosenthal - 1993 - International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (4):449-464.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-05-12
Total views
5 ( #1,207,698 of 2,519,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,317 )
2015-05-12
Total views
5 ( #1,207,698 of 2,519,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
